Surface Microtextures of Quartz Grains and Origin of the Paleogene Sands in the Ulyanovsk-Syzran Volga Region

Quartz grains were separated by standard sieving of the Paleogene sands from the Sosnovka Formation of the Ulyanovsk-Syzran Volga region, which are a scarce and valuable raw material for glass making and construction. In order to establish the origin of the sands and restore the facies conditions of their formation, the surface microtextures of the separated quartz grains were examined by optical and electron microscopy. It was shown that the clastic grains of the Sosnovka sands bear the signs of a multi-stage formation process under the conditions of subaquatic (beach zone), eolian, mixed subaquatic-eolian (coastal dunes), injective, and continental pedological settings. For the first time, a complex of microtextures characteristic of the extrusion of grains from deep horizons under pressure and inherent in the injection   mechanism of sand formation was described. The diagnostic complex of injectites includes rotational   microtextures, notched microtroughs, and deformed fluid inclusions. The rather fresh appearance of the listed microtextures suggests that they were superimposed on the coastal-marine and eolian stages of the evolution with the subsequent formation of sand intrusions. At the final stage of the geological history of the Sosnovka sands, the grains were shaped by the continental pedological conditions, when secondary silica in the form of globules and their clusters cemented the quartz grains, the surface of which concatenated the features of the previous stages. Based on the results of the study, an interpretation scheme summarizing various microtextural features of the reconstructed paleoenvironments and the stages of formation the Sosnovka sands was developed. The finding that the Sosnovka sands are sand intrusions is of great practical importance, as it necessitates new approaches to the discovery and prediction of glass and quartz sand deposits confined to the Paleogene Sosnovka Formation of the Ulyanovsk-Syzran Volga region.

1. Georgiev V.M. A methodology for examining detrital quartz microtextures using electron microscopy. Lithol. Polezn. Iskop., 1982, no. 6, pp. 37–48. (In Russian)

2. Krinsley D.H., Doornkamp J.C. Atlas of Quartz Sand Surface Textures. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1973. 91 p.

3. Mahaney W.C. Atlas of Sand Grain Surface Textures and Applications. New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 2002. 237 p.

4. Vos K., Vandenberhe N., Elsen J. Surface textural analysis of quartz grains by scanning electron microscopy (SEM): From sample preparation to environmental interpretation. Earth-Sci. Rev., 2014, vol. 128, pp. 93–104. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.10.013.

5. Zorina S.O., Afanasyeva N.I. The sand injectites in the Russian Platform’s Paleogene sediments. Stratigr. Sedimentol. Oil-Gas Basins, 2012, vol. 2, pp. 35–48.

6. Leonov G.P. Osnovnye voprosy regional’noi stratigrafii paleogenovykh otlozhenii Russkoi platformy [Major Problems in the Regional Stratigraphy of the Paleogene Deposits of the Russian Platform]. Moscow, Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1961. 552 p. (In Russian)

7. Distanov U.G. Accumulation of silicious rocks in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic platform basins. In: Kremnistye porody SSSR [Silicious rock of the USSR]. Kazan, 1976, pp. 255–262. (In Russian)

8. Akhmet’ev M.A., Shik S.M., Alekseev A.S. Unifitsirovannaya stratigraficheskaya skhema paleogenovykh otlozhenii Povolzhsko-Prikaspiiskogo subregiona [Unified Stratigraphic Scheme of Paleogene Deposits of the Volga-Caspian Subregion]. Moscow, VNIGNI, 2015. 96 p. (In Russian)

9. Higgs R. Quartz-grain surface features of Mesozoic–Cenozoic sands from the Labrador and western Greenland continental margins. J. Sediment. Petrol., 1979, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 599–610. doi: 10.1306/212F779D-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D.

10. Braccini E., de Boer W., Hurst A., Huuse M., Vigorito M., Templeton G. Sand injectites. Oilfield Rev., 2008, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 33–49.

11. Hurst A., Scott A., Vigorito M. Physical characteristics of sand injectites. Earth-Sci. Rev., 2011, vol. 106, nos. 3–4, pp. 215–246. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.02.004.

12. Dixon R.J., Schofield K., Anderton R., Reynolds A.D., Alexander R.W.S., Williams M.C., Davies K.G. Sandstone diapirism and clastic intrusion in the Tertiary submarine fans of the BruceBeryl Embayment, Quadrant 9, UKCS. In: Hartley A.J., Prosser D.J. (Eds.) Characterization of Deep Marine Clastic Systems. Vol. 94. Book Ser.: Geological Society, London, Special Publications. London, Geol. Soc., 1995. pp. 77–94.

13. Davies R.J., Huuse M., Hirst Ph., Cartwright J., Yang Y. Giant clastic intrusions primed by silica diagenesis. Geology, 2006, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 917–920. doi: 10.1130/G22937A.1.

14. Løseth H., Rodrigues N., Cobbold P.R. World’s largest extrusive body of sand? Geology, 2012, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 467–470. doi: 10.1130/G33117.1.

15. Jolly R.J.H., Lonergan L. Mechanisms and controls on the formation of sand intrusions. J. Geol. Soc., 2002, vol. 159, no. 5, pp. 605–617. doi: 10.1144/0016-764902-025.

16. Ross J.A., Peakall J., Keevil G.M. An integrated model of extrusive sand injectites in cohesionless sediments. Sedimentology, 2011, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1693–1715. doi: 10.1111/j.13653091.2011.01230.x.

17. Van Loon A.J.(T.). Sedimentary volcanoes: Overview and implications for the definitions of a volcano on Earth. In: Cañón-Tapia E., Szakács A. (Eds.) What is Volcano? Special Paper 470. Geol. Soc. Am., 2010, pp. 31–41. doi: 10.1130/2010.2470(03).