A new two-stage method for producing porous membranes based on polyphenylene sulfide

A new two-stage method for the fabrication of a porous membrane from polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) was proposed. The approach involves the production of PPS films with a filler and the subsequent removal of the filler material from the film to form a porous structure. Polyarylene sulfones, such as polysulfone (PSF), polyethersulfone, and polyphenylene sulfone (PPSU), were investigated as fillers for the first time. The concentration of the pore-forming additive was 30 % (wt.). The filler was extracted from the films through thermolysis in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) for 12 h at different temperatures (70, 90, and 202 °C). Thermolysis conditions for the complete removal of PSF and PPSU from the PPS film were found empirically. The porous structure of the resulting PPS membranes was examined using scanning electron microscopy, liquid porometry, and gas permeability testing for specific gases (He, N₂, and CO₂). The samples of porous membranes from PPS with an average pore diameter of 160 nm, corresponding to the range of microfiltration, were o btained.

1. Sholl D.S., Lively R.P. Seven chemical separations to change the world. Nature, 2016, vol. 532, no. 7600, pp. 435–437. https://doi.org/10.1038/532435a.

2. Chisca S., Musteata V.-E., Zhang W., Vasylevskyi S., Falca G., Abou-Hamad E., Emwas A.-H., Altunkaya M., Nunes S.P. Polytriazole membranes with ultrathin tunable selective layer for crude oil fractionation. Science, 2022, vol. 376, no. 6597, pp. 1105–1110. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm7686.

3. Kutowy O., Guerin P., Tweddle T.A., Woods J. Use of membranes for oil upgrading. Proc. 35th Canadian Chemical Engineering Conf. Vol. 1. Ottawa, Can. Soc. Chem. Eng., 1985, p. 241.

4. Kutowy O., Tweddle T.A., Hazlett J.D. Method for the molecular filtration of predominantly aliphatic hydrocarbon liquids. Patent US 4814088. 1989.

5. Ramirez-Corredores M.M. The Science and Technology of Unconventional Oils: Finding Refining Opportunities. Cambridge, MA, Acad. Press, 2017. 761 p.

6. Ashtari M., Ashrafizadeh S.N., Bayat M. Asphaltene removal from crude oil by means of ceramic membranes. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2012, vols. 82–83, pp. 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2012.01.001.

7. Barbier J., Marques J., Caumette G., Merdrignac I., Bouyssiere B., Lobinski R., Lienemann C.-P. Monitoring the behaviour and fate of nickel and vanadium complexes during vacuum residue hydrotreatment and fraction separation. Fuel Process. Technol., 2014, vol. 119, pp. 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.11.004.

8. Ching M.-J.T.M., Pomerantz A.E., Andrews A.B., Dryden P., Schroeder R., Mullins O.C., Harrison C. On the nanofiltration of asphaltene solutions, crude oils, and emulsions. Energy Fuels, 2010, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 5028–5037. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef100645b.

9. Sarrade S., Guizard C., Rios G.M. New applications of supercritical fluids and supercritical fluids processes in separation. Sep. Purif. Technol., 2003, vol. 32, nos. 1–3, pp. 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(03)00054-6.

10. Markelov A.V. Generalization of the results of studies of ultrafiltration processes for the regeneration of used technical oils. Modern High Technologies. Regional Application. 2023, no. 3(75), pp. 69–76. https://doi.org/10.6060/snt.20237503.0009. (In Russian)

11. Widodo S., Ariono D., Khoiruddin K., Hakim A.N., Wenten I.G. Recent advances in waste lube oils processing technologies. Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy, 2018, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1867–1881. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13011.

12. Lu D., Mai Y.-W., Li R.K.Y., Ye L. Impact strength and crystallization behavior of nano-SiOx/poly(phenylene sulfide) (PPS) composites with heat-treated PPS. Macromol. Mater. Eng., 2003, vol. 288, no. 9, pp. 693–698. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.200300088.

13. Gu J., Du J., Dang J., Geng W., Hu S., Zhang Q. Thermal conductivities, mechanical and thermal properties of graphite nanoplatelets/polyphenylene sulfide composites. RSC Adv., 2014, vol. 4, no. 42, pp. 22101–22105. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA01761G.

14. Ma C.-C.M., Lee C.-L., Tai N.-H. Chemical resistance of carbon fiber-reinforced poly(ether ether ketone) and poly(phenylene sulfide) composites. Polym. Compos., 1992, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 435–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.750130606.

15. Liu J., Qin J., Mo Y., Wang S., Han D., Xiao M., Meng Y. Polyphenylene sulfide separator for high safety lithium-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2019, vol. 166, no. 8, pp. A1644–A1652. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1041908jes.

16. Brady D.G. The crystallinity of poly(phenylene sulfide) and its effect on polymer properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1976, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 2541–2551. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1976.070200921.

17. Yan P., Peng W., Yang F., Cao Y., Xiang M., Wu T., Fu Q. Investigation on thermal degradation mechanism of poly(phenylene sulfide). Polym. Degrad. Stab., 2022, vol. 197, art. 109863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.109863.

18. Zhao L., Yu Y., Huang H., Yin X., Peng J., Sun J., Huang L., Tang Y., Wang L. High-performance polyphenylene sulfide composites with ultra-high content of glass fiber fabrics. Composites, Part B, 2019, vol. 174, art. 106790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.001.