Preview

Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta Seriya Estestvennye Nauki

Advanced search

Paleomagnetism of the Great Dyke of the Kola Peninsula (2.68 Ga): New Evidence of Ultra-Low Paleointensity of the Earth’s Magnetic Field in the Late Archean

https://doi.org/10.26907/2542-064X.2023.4.537-549

Abstract

Giant mafic dykes are the key markers of the Earth’s evolution in the Precambrian and have been the subject of extensive research. This article presents the results of the paleomagnetic, rock-magnetic, and paleointensity Banc studies of the Great Dyke of the Kola Peninsula (2.68 Ga). The mean paleomagnetic  direction of the characteristic magnetization component and the paleomagnetic pole of the Murmansk craton were calculated using the data from 5 sites (n = 41 samples): D = 117.6°, I = 77.1°, K = 40.9, α95 = 12.1°, slat = 69.265°, slong = 34.35447°, plat = 51.5°, plong = 70.7°, dp/dm = 21.1°/22.6°, and paleolat = 65°. The rocks under study were thoroughly examined for their thermomagnetic properties, revealing that the main carriers of remanent magnetization are single-domain or small pseudo–single-domain (group A) or multidomain (group B) magnetite. The paleointensity values Banc = (6.16 ± 0.92) μT were obtained for 12 samples from group A by the Thellier–Coe method. The corresponding mean virtual dipole moment VDM2.68Ga = (0.85 ± 0.13)×1022 Am2 was determined. These new findings align with previous results on the Archean and Proterozoic objects, indicating that the Earth’s magnetic field was remarkably weak in the Late Archean.

About the Authors

V. V. Shcherbakova
Borok Geophysical Observatory, Sсhmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Borok, 152742 Russia



R. V. Veselovskiy
Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences; Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Moscow, 123242 Russia; 
Faculty of Geology, Moscow, 119991



G. V. Zhidkov
Borok Geophysical Observatory, Sсhmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Borok, 152742 Russia



N. A. Aphinogenova
Borok Geophysical Observatory, Sсhmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Borok, 152742 Russia



A. V. Samsonov
Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Moscow, 119017 Russia



A. V. Stepanova
Institute of Geology, Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Petrozavodsk, 185910 Russia



M. A. Smirnov
Borok Geophysical Observatory, Sсhmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Borok, 152742 Russia



References

1. Stepanova A.V., Samsonov A.V., Salnikova E.B., Egorova S.V., Larionova Yu.O., Arzamastsev A.A., Larionov A.N., Sukhanova M.A., Veselovskiy R.V. The Great Dyke of the Kola Peninsula as a marker of an Archean cratonization in the northern Fennoscandian shield. Petrology, 2022, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1134/S086959112206008X.

2. Veselovskiy R.V., Dubinya N.V., Ponomarev A.V., Fokin I.V., Patonin A.V., Pasenko A.M., Fetisova A.M., Matveev M.A., Afinogenova N.A., Rud’ko D.V., Chistyakova A.V. Shared Research Facilities “Petrophysics, Geomechanics and Paleomagnetism” of the Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences. Geodin. Tektonofiz., 2022, vol. 13, no. 2, art. 0579. https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2022-13-2-0579. (In Russian)

3. Efremov I.V., Veselovskiy R.V. PMTools: New application for paleomagnetic data analysis. Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2023, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 798–805. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351323050026.

4. Thellier E., Thellier O. Sur l’intensité du champ magnétique terrestre dans le passé historique et géologique. Ann. Geophys., 1959, vol. 15, fasc. 3, p. 285–376. (In French)

5. Coe R.S. The determination of paleo-intensities of the Earth’s magnetic field with emphasis on mechanisms which could cause non-ideal behavior in Thellier’s method. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 1967, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 157–179. https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.19.157.

6. Prevot M., Mankinen E.A., Coe R.S., Grommé C.S. The Steens Mountain (Oregon) geomagnetic polarity transition: 2. Field intensity variations and discussion of reversal models. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 1985, vol. 90, no. B12, pp. 10417–10448. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb090ib12p10417.

7. Shcherbakova V.V., Pasenko A.M., Zhidkov G.V., Shcherbakov V.P., Aphinogenova N.A. An ultralow geomagnetic field intensity in the Mesoproterozoic based on studies of 1380 Ma old intrusivebodiesfromthe Udzhaaulacogenofthe Siberian Platform. Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2023, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 682–703. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351323050105.

8. Shcherbakova V.V., Shcherbakov V.P., Heider F Properties of partial thermoremanent magnetization in pseudosingle domain and multidomain magnetite grains. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 2000, vol. 105, no. B1, pp. 767–781. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900235.

9. The World Paleointensity Database. Website of the Borok Geophysical Observatory, Sсhmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022. URL: http://wwwbrk.adm.yar.ru/palmag/index.html.

10. Driscoll P.E. Simulating 2 Ga of geodynamo history. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2016, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 5680–5687. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068858.


Review

For citations:


Shcherbakova V.V., Veselovskiy R.V., Zhidkov G.V., Aphinogenova N.A., Samsonov A.V., Stepanova A.V., Smirnov M.A. Paleomagnetism of the Great Dyke of the Kola Peninsula (2.68 Ga): New Evidence of Ultra-Low Paleointensity of the Earth’s Magnetic Field in the Late Archean. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta Seriya Estestvennye Nauki. 2023;165(4):537-549. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2542-064X.2023.4.537-549

Views: 877


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-064X (Print)
ISSN 2500-218X (Online)